Revisiones en Cáncer H0156
Resumen| PDF

Revisión

Cáncer de mama hereditario


Logo Descargas   Número de descargas: 45934      Logo Visitas   Número de visitas: 1608      Citas   Citas: 0

Compártelo:


Hasta el 10 % de los pacientes con cáncer de mama (CM) han heredado mutaciones en línea germinal que a menudo conducen a la pérdida de la función de los genes implicados en la reparación del ADN y a la activación del punto de control del ciclo celular. Además de los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2, se ha establecido asociación con riesgo elevado o moderado de cáncer de mama para otros genes, como PALB2, ATM y CHEK2. La incorporación de técnicas de NGS al estudio genético permite su identificación. Los individuos portadores sanos y afectados pueden beneficiarse de recomendaciones de medidas de detección precoz y de reducción de riesgo. Actualmente, las opciones de tratamiento son limitadas para los pacientes con CM mutado en gBRCA. Los inhibidores de la poli(ADP-ribosa) polimerasa (PARP) son una opción terapéutica dirigida que ha demostrado actividad en el cáncer de mama hereditario.

Palabras Clave: BRCA1. BRCA2. Inhibidores PARP. Cáncer de mama hereditario.



Narod S, Foulkes W. BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:665-76.
Easton DF, Pharoah PDP, Antoniou AC, et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2243-57.
Nielsen FC, van Overeem HT, Sørensen CS. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes in confined pathways. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16:599-612.
Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J. Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. N Engl J Med 2021;384(5):428-39.
Schmidt MK, Hogervorst F, van Hien R, et al. Age and tumor subtype-specific breast cancer risk estimates for CHEK-2*1100delC carriers. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2750-60.
Judkins T, Rosenthal E, Arnell C, et al. Clinical significance of large rearrangements inBRCA1andBRCA2. Cancer 2012;118(21):5210-6.
González-Santiago S, Ramón y Cajal T, Aguirre E, et al. SEOM clinical guidelines in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (2019). Clin Transl Oncol 2020;22:193-200.
Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Hughes K, et al. Underdiagnosis of hereditary breast cancer: are genetic testing guidelines a tool or an obstacle? J Clin Oncol 2019;37:453-60.
Leary E, Iacoboni D, Holle J, et al. Expanded gene panel use for women with breast cancer: identification and intervention beyond breast cancer risk. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:3060-6. 10. Mandelker D, Donoghue M, Talukdar S. Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group, Ann Oncol 2019;30(8):1221-31.
NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2022 Genetic/Familial Hig-Risk Asseement: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic.
Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 2017;317:2402-16.
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8469-76.
Phi XA, Saadatmand S, De Bock GH, et al. Contribution of mammography to MRI screening in BRCA mutation carriers by BRCA status and age: individual patient data meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2016;114:631-7.
Narod SA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P, et al. Screening mammography and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:402-6.
Tung N, Domchek SM, Stadler Z, et al. Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13:581-8.
Lee A, Mavaddat N, Wilcox AN, et al. BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors. Genet Med 2019;21:1708-18.
Choudhury PP, Brook MN, Wilcox AN, et al. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population based prospective cohort. medRxiv 2020;2020.04.27.20081265.
Lakeman IMM, Rodríguez-Girondo M, Lee A, et al. Validation of the BOADICEA model and a 313-variant polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk prediction in a Dutch prospective cohort. GenetMed 2020;22:1803-11.
Oh M, McBride A, Yun S, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;110(11):1178-89.
Dbouk M, Katona BW, Brand RE, et al. The Multicenter Cancer of Pancreas Screening Study: Impact on Stage and Survival. J Clin Oncol 2022;Jun 15:2200298.
Ludwig KK, Neuner J, Butler A, et al. Risk reduction and survival benefit of prophylactic surgery in BRCA mutation carriers, asystematic review. Am J Surg 2016;212(4):660-9.
Li X, You R, Wang X, et al. Effective ness of prophylactic surgeries in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:3971-81.
Heemskerk-Gerritsen B, Jager A, Koppert LB, et al. Survival after bilateral risk reducing mastectomy in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;177:723-33.
Carbine NE, Lostumbo L, Wallace J, et al. Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;4(4):CD002748.
Jakub JW, Peled AW, Gray RJ, et al. Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study. JAMA Surg 2018;153(2):123-9.
Tung N, Domchek SM, Stadler Z, et al. Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13:581-8.
Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM. Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101(2):80-7.
Finch AP, Lubinski J, Moller P, et al. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1547-53.
Xiao YL, Wang K, Liu Q, et al. Risk reduction and survival benefit of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in hereditary breast cancer: meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer 2019;19(1):e48-e65.
Harmsen MG, Piek JMJ, Bulten J, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Cancer 2018;124:952-9.
Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J, et al. Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7491-6.
Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ, et al. Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107.
Terry MB, Daly MB, Phillips KA, et al. Risk-reducing oophorectomy and breast cancer risk across the spectrum of familial risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019;111:331-4.
Stjepanovic N, Villacampa G, Nead KT, et al. Association of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: maximising bias-reduction. Eur J Cancer 2020;132:53-60.
Choi YH, Terry MB, Daly MB, et al. Association of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with breast cancer risk in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. JAMA Oncol 2021;7:585-92.
Domchek SM, Robson ME. Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 20;37(27):2501-250918. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Version 3. 2019.
King M, Wieand S, Hale K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in brca1 and brca2: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 2001;286(18):2251-6.
Phillips KA, Milne RL, Rookus MA, et al. Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3091-9.
Pujol P, Roca L, Lortholary A, et al. Five year letrozole versus placebo in BRCA1/2germline mutations carriers: Final results of LIBER, a double-blind randomized phase III breast cancer prevention trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38(15):1534-1534.
Kotsopoulos J, Lubinski J, Moller P, et al. Timing of oral contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;143(3):579-86.
Iodice S, Barile M, Rotmensz N, et al. Oral contraceptive use and breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2275-84.
Moorman PG, Havrilesky LJ, Gierisch JM, et al. Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer among high-risk women: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:4188-98.
Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Rookus MA, Aalfs CM, et al. Improved overall survival after contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of unilateral breast cancer: a prospective analysis. Int J Cancer 2015;136(3):668-77.
Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, et al. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2018;29:1497-508.
Tutt A, Tovey H, Chon U, et al. A randomised phase III trial of carboplatin compared with docetaxel in BRCA1/2 mutated and pre-specified triple negative breast cancer “BRCA-ness” subgroups: the TNT Trial. Nat Med 2018;24(5):628-37.
Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med 2017;377:523-33.
Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med 2018;379:753-63.
Tung NM, Robson ME, Ventz S, et al. TBCRC 048: phase II study of olaparib for metastatic breast cancer and mutations in homologous recombination-related genes. J Clin Oncol 2020;38(36):4274-82.
Mateo J, Lord CJ, Serra V, et al. A decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1437-47.
Tutt NJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2394-405.
Vinayak S, Tolaney SM, Schwartzberg L, et al. Open-label clinical trial of niraparib combined with pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:1132-40.
Domchek SM, Postel-Vinay S, Im SA, et al. Phase II study of olaparib (O) and durvalumab (D) (MEDIOLA): updated results in patients (pts) with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Ann Oncol 2019;30(Suppl 5):v477.
Dieras VC, Han HS, Kaufman B, Wildiers H et al. Phase III study of veliparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in HER2-negative advanced/metastatic gBRCA-associated breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019;30(Suppl.5):v8557-8.

Revisión: Cáncer de mama hereditario

Raquel Andrés Conejero , Rodrigo Lastra del Prado , María Zurera Berjaga , Estefanía Arévalo Vázquez

Artículos más populares


Una cookie o galleta informática es un pequeño archivo de información que se guarda en su navegador cada vez que visita nuestra página web. La utilidad de las cookies es guardar el historial de su actividad en nuestra página web, de manera que, cuando la visite nuevamente, ésta pueda identificarle y configurar el contenido de la misma en base a sus hábitos de navegación, identidad y preferencias. Las cookies pueden ser aceptadas, rechazadas, bloqueadas y borradas, según desee. Ello podrá hacerlo mediante las opciones disponibles en la presente ventana o a través de la configuración de su navegador, según el caso. En caso de que rechace las cookies no podremos asegurarle el correcto funcionamiento de las distintas funcionalidades de nuestra página web. Más información en el apartado “POLÍTICA DE COOKIES” de nuestra página web.