Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE, Lobontiu A, Saint F, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote-controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964-6.
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66251-9
Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, Fromont G, Menon M, Vallancien G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 2001;40(1):70-4.
DOI: 10.1159/000049751
Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Bhandari A, et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:701-17.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.011
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, et al. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51(3):648-57.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.055
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur Urol 2009;56(1):89-96.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.032
Secin FP, Joborn-Andres T, Bjartell S. Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;53:134-45.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.028
Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Taari K, Busch C, Nordling S, et al. Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer - 29-Year Follow-up. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2319.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801
Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Andriole GL, Culkin D, Wheeler T, et al. Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;377(2):132-42.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, et al. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375815):1415-24.
Luo X, Yi M, Hu Q, Yin W. Prostatectomy Versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Scand J Surg 2021;110(1):78-85.
DOI: 10.1177/1457496919883962
EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023.
Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N, et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 2012;61(3):480-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044
Cimino S, Reale G, Castelli T, Favilla V, Giardina R, Russo GI, et al. Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 2017;51(5):345-50.
DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1332680
Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Zaffuto E, Bandini M, Dell'Oglio P, Bravi CA, et al. Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2017;72(4):632-40.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.049
Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, de Angelis M, Barletta F, et al. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard. Eur Urol Oncol 2022;5(1):1-17.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.08.001
Moreno Sierra J, Galante Romo MI, Senovilla Pérez JL, Redondo González E, Galindo Herrero I, Barrera-Ortega J, et al. Oncologic outcomes in 408 consecutive patient cohort treated with da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2020;44(3):179-86.
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.11.001
Tewari AK, Ali A, Metgud S, Theckumparampil N, Srivastava A, Khani F, et al. Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing. World J Urol 2013;31(3):471-80.
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-1018-7
Basourakos SP, Zhu A, Lewicki PJ, Ramaswamy A, Cheng E, Dudley V, et al. Clipless Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus 2022;8(5):1176-85.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.010
Preisser F, Gandaglia G, Arad F, Karakiewicz PI, Bandini M, Pompe RS, et al. Association of neurovascular bundle preservation with oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021;248(1):193-201.
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00266-4
Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:702-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032
Clarebrough EE, Challacombe BJ, Briggs C, Namdarian B, Weston R, Murphy DG, et al. Cadaveric analysis of periprostatic nerve distribution: an anatomical basis for high anterior release during radical prostatectomy? J Urol 2011;185:1519-25.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.046
Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, Salomon G, Engel O, Michl U, et al. Full functional- length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011;60:320-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.040
Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Coelho RF, Patel VR, Tewari A, et al. Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;62:779-90.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.041
Gilbert SM, Dunn RL, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Skolarus TA, Weizer AZ, et al. Functional outcomes following nerve sparing prostatectomy augmented with seminal vesicle sparing compared to standard nerve sparing prostatectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2017;198(3):600-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.133
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 2010;58(3):457-61.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008
Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Díaz M, Tallman C, Abdollah F, et al. Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 2018;199(5):1210-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115
Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Han WK, Chung BH, Hong SJ, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int 2014;114:236-44.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12705
Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 2013;64(6):974-80.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046
Minafra P, Carbonara U, Vitarelli A, Lucarelli G, Battaglia M, Ditonno P. Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era. Curr Opin Urol 2021;31:11-7.
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000830
Lai A, Dobbs RW, Talamini S, Halgrimson WR, Wilson JO, Vigneswaran HT, et al. Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 2020;9(2):898-905.
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.05
Tugcu V, Eksi M, Sahin S, Çolakoglu Y, Simsek A, Evren I, et al. Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: a review of 95 cases. BJU Int 2020;125:573-8.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15018
Tugcu V, Akça O, Simsek A, Yigitbasi I, Sahin S, Yenice MG, et al. Robotic-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis. Turk J Urol 2019;45:265-72.
DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.98254
Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 2016;388:1057-66.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X
Sooriakumaran P, Pini G, Nyberg T, Derogar M, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Erectile function and oncologic outcomes following open retropubic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial. Eur Urol 2018;4:618-27.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015
Nyberg M, Hugosson J, Wiklund P, Sjoberg D, Wilderäng U, Carlsson SV, et al. Functional and oncologic outcomes between open and robotic radical prostatectomy at 24-month follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2018;5:353-60.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.012
Thompson JE, Egger S, Böhm M, Siriwardana AR, Haynes AM, Matthews J, et al. Superior biochemical recurrence and long-term quality-of-life outcomes are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve – updated analysis of a prospective single-surgeon cohort of 2206 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2018;73:664-71.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.035
Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, Mele F, Checcucci E, et al. Five-year outcomes for a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2018;1:80-6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.007
Haese A, Knipper S, Isbarn H, Heinzer H, Tilki D, Salomon G, et al. A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. BJU Int 2019;123:1031-40.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14760
Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Stabile A, Bandini M, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, et al. Radical prostatectomy in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer: results of single-institution series with long-term follow-up. Eur Urol 2017;289-92.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.040
Jang WS, Kim MS, Jeong WS, Chang KD, Cho KS, Ham WS, et al. Does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy benefit patients with prostate cancer and bone oligometastases? BJU Int 2018;121:225-31.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13992
Número de descargas:
2235
Número de visitas:
157
Citas:
0
